Back in 2014, I was at a meeting with a prominent French bank about a challenging project. At the time, “low-code” was a fresh concept, and the bank aimed to build its own low-code IDE to let business analysts craft UIs and speed up delivery.

The team already knew each other from previous projects, so introductions were a formality. Our manager introduced everyone: “This elegant lady is the delivery manager, that serious gentleman is the team lead…”
When he got to me, the bank’s IT manager interrupted, winked, and joked, “The guy’s doing nothing!”

We laughed sincerely and moved on.

During an after-work with some dear colleagues, one asked: “How can we define our success?”.

People started throwing answers like : by the customer’s happiness, by listing the greatest achievements, the metrics hit, by the completed tasks and goals, the career evolution or even by the gain accumulated.

Unsurprisingly, I was unsatisfied. These answers looked more like a standard pitch to succeed in an interview rather than deep thoughts.

In my opinion, one’s success can’t be measured only by corporate expectations; a career can’t be measured only by goals, achievements or accumulated wealth; a professional can’t be successful only by positive feedback or customer satisfaction.

And what about Architects, as the disgraced-and-always-blamed people in an organization ?
How can they measure their successes, especially since they only provide listening, more questions and rarely one option?

Going back to old discussions with engineers, architects and CTOs, I noticed that practically all of them started their projects with passion and commitment but got trapped in the most crucial moments to be stuck with complexity, over-engineering and money-draining.

In a world where specialization is often hailed as the pinnacle of success, I find myself cheerfully perched atop the hill of ambiguity, happily wearing the badge of a “polyglot” in the tech cosmos.

This term, I’ve grown quite attached to it over the years, It’s morphed from its linguistic origins to become, synonymous with an approach that values versatility over specificity.
Yes, I’m the Architect who dances between the raindrops of technology stacks, merging them into a harmonious symphony.

Today, I’m here to share some thoughts about the unique and somewhat underappreciated role of a polyglot architect.