<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Technical-Debt on Hatem Zidi</title><link>https://blog.hatemzidi.com/tags/technical-debt/</link><description>Recent content in Technical-Debt
on Hatem Zidi</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><managingEditor>me@hatemzidi.com (Hatem ZIDI)</managingEditor><webMaster>me@hatemzidi.com (Hatem ZIDI)</webMaster><copyright>© 2005-2026 Hatem Zidi</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.hatemzidi.com/tags/technical-debt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Stop Confusing Metrics with Quality</title><link>https://blog.hatemzidi.com/2025/11/25/stop-confusing-metrics-with-quality/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>me@hatemzidi.com (Hatem ZIDI)</author><guid>https://blog.hatemzidi.com/2025/11/25/stop-confusing-metrics-with-quality/</guid><description>
&lt;pre tabindex="0"&gt;&lt;code&gt;Quality is subjective.
Architecture is judgemental.
So how on earth do we measure it?
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;p&gt;Every architecture review, every design workshop, every committee meeting eventually hits the same wall. Someone asks: “But is this actually good?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We pretend the answer lives in metrics. Response times. Availability. Coupling scores. Maturity models. Dashboards filled with comforting colours. We convince ourselves that if the numbers are green, the architecture is good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the uncomfortable reality: half the time, those numbers are illusions. They tell part of the story.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve witnessed perfectly green dashboards collapse the moment real business pressure appeared.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>